🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency triggered by the introduction of a new 28-article proposal for achieving ceasefire appeared – briefly – to have been contained. A senior US official spoke of "notable headway" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its response: another massive barrage of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Rhythm of Negotiation and Warfare

The sequence of contrasting events captured the harsh reality of the current period. By day, political struggles are waged: optimistic declarations are delivered from various governments. Considerable effort is expended on managing specific proposals. By night, the Kremlin brutally reminds the world that, for them, military action persists as the primary tool for achieving "resolution".

After-Dark Attacks

As Russia's attack progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's vulnerability was laid bare. Ukraine is able to track rocket firings from Russian territory, a capability afforded by timely intelligence. From vantage locations, defense planes that had been scrambled to intercept incoming aerial threats flew past – sophisticated military planes supplied to Ukraine by NATO members.

Shortly after, Kyiv's missile defense thundered: multiple launches deployed against a hostile projectile. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, presumably supplied through allied countries. Every launch creates sudden vibrations, causing tremors. The brief panic quickly becomes grim resignation: possibly the incoming missile won't hit its mark this time, protecting urban areas from devastation and additional electricity failures.

Persistent Threats

Following this, a heavy machine gun opened up on a unmanned aircraft close by, part of a rapid response unit – most likely Western-made equipment. Unfortunately, the bullets missed the hostile drone – it maintained course toward its destination.

Periodically, this continued until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the daybreak reports: seven people killed, devastation and utility failures in many homes as a result of the nocturnal offensive. As typically, everyone still went about their day – experiencing conflict. But those full day encapsulated Ukraine's critical military reliance on external assistance – a reliance that European nations are demonstrably unable to substitute in the immediate future.

Failed Diplomacy

The detailed framework from US administration generated strong feelings, discussion and serious worry – and temporarily diverted attention from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have seen this script before, after earlier high-level meetings and multilateral gatherings.

Every new initiative from Washington adheres to the identical sequence: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, effectively counters. They manage the tension but never actually win the battle. This trend will, undoubtedly, persist.

Political Considerations

It is tempting to accuse specific actors of repeatedly advocating Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. American leadership functions according to a principle well known to seasoned negotiators: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have been unable to protect through force. The US administration believes that it is impossible to compel Moscow to relinquish the land that it already controls in Ukraine's southern or eastern regions.

The challenge is that while acknowledging this situation, US leadership does nothing to discourage Russia, through diplomacy or military means, from assuming that the current condition will not shift further in its benefit in the months ahead.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, the Kremlin is confident that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its supporters are nearing depletion. Their reason to sign a deal that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is close to zero. There may be numerous efforts to end hostilities, but they will carry on as long as Russia's leadership remains supremely confident in the outcome.

On the contrary, Ukrainian leadership believes that Ukraine can still hold out, progressively conceding lives and land but avoiding a entire defensive failure until circumstances change in its favour.

Present Conditions

Objectively, there are no genuine requirements for a ceasefire. Now, subjective factors are coming into play: leadership ambitions to negotiate peace and secure international recognition, and the government's twin challenges – on one hand, not to distance important partners, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the country's interests against any proposal Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their priority does not move to homefront challenges. And although their task will now be considerably more difficult after current events, it remains very improbable that this will change their overall approach.

These conflicting dynamics are driving the talks.

Assessment and Future

It took a just a single week to terminate the 28 points of the most recent proposal. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by American leadership, pushback by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with calming attempts of representatives, and finally, recent disclosures, all served their function.

While new proposals based on previous concepts are imminent, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter negotiation assaults from Washington that are based on Russian demands and demonstrate certain reluctance to alter the situation, if they remain united and enhance their military capacity at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the foreseeable future, largely rely on sustained allied backing.