🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to resume atomic discussions with the United States provided that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared new appeals had come from mediators to resume talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the global atomic watchdog to inspect attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is treading a difficult course since Iran does not want be perceived to be proceeding from a situation of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged stronger in military terms and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Terminated

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that concluded with the US president claiming the sites had been obliterated. Following this, EU nations employed their authority to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Representatives claimed three times they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Present Status

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be reintroduced in certain ways if negotiations reopen.

The American leader last week claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from the United States either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of passivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his speech to the forum, designed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the idea of international law, Araghchi said the two-week conflict revealed the dispute could not be ended by combat operations. He asserted the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust hard to rebuild.

Negotiations Remains the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently sought to enforce their demands during the talks. Diplomacy can still be viable and stays the final answer to address disputes, but its requirements, regulations and principles must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the Iranian people with the approach of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the identical language."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He continued: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, stays intact. The sites and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to destroy. The nation of Iran have developed more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the government and the state in the wake of this attack."